Solar hydrogen home Michael Strizki

default Solar hydrogen home Michael Strizki

The First Solar/ Hydrogen House located in Hopewell New Jersey


Solar hydrogen home Michael Strizki

Texas Instruments 36 X Solar Calculator

300710623550 0 Solar hydrogen home Michael StrizkiUS $3.99 (0 Bid)
End Date: Sunday May-20-2012 18:10:41 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

Magic SchoolBus: Solar System CD Age 6-10 WIN - NEW SLV
251061927087 0 Solar hydrogen home Michael StrizkiUS $7.98 (0 Bid)
End Date: Sunday May-20-2012 18:10:48 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

Planets, Solar System Mens Surgical Scrub Hat Du Rag Colorful Handmade NEW
300710624040 0 Solar hydrogen home Michael StrizkiUS $4.49 (0 Bid)
End Date: Sunday May-20-2012 18:11:16 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

Related posts:

  1. Energy – Guide To Building Home Wind Turbines And Home Solar Power.
  2. Energy – Guide To Building Home Wind Turbines and Home Solar Power
  3. Passive Solar House: The Complete Guide to Heating and Cooling Your Home
  4. Installing Solar Panels on Home
  5. SOLAR PANEL HHO PV PHOTOVOLTAIC HYDROGEN HARD DRIVE PLATTERS Science Experiment

25 Responses to Solar hydrogen home Michael Strizki

  1. jewishcrimenetwork

    But this system must have been really expensive. How many years of saving electricity to compensate the expense?

    Anyway very interesting.

  2. razvanon

    very nice work, but i think that when you calculate the investment there were enough money to spend on conventional energy for your entire life if not more

  3. snowbal1776

    very cool ….. you are way ahead of the curve and ppl who don’t see that forget them… you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make em drink… 5*****

  4. astrialkil

    @johnson1095 To sell electricity back to the grid you have to have a UL listed device collecting the energy…so no home made anything. Also some utilities only let your bill go down to zero, they wont send you a check for extra energy you send to them.

  5. astrialkil

    Hydride is also expensive or heavy or absorbs too slowly for most uses, there are many different hydride and they haven’t found the ideal one yet..

  6. motiyokiletana

    Real online naughty women collection benaughtyman.info

  7. snowonweb

    dont like it if you work for oil company or just an imbecile. Instead of spending money on the electric boat, that dude should make his setup widely avaliable and focus on helping others achieve the same. I mean the video is nice but we need the details. what where and how when. If the video was banned either copyright or the corporate sponsor didnt like it.

  8. johnson1095

    If u sell electricity back to the grid, i heard they pay u money back?
    Is that thrue and if so, how much?

  9. dsgni

    what’s the cost of a house like this…???

  10. commando7144

    storing it in a hydride form is so safe if you put a torch to it it would smolder like a ciggarettte.and you can store more in that form than in a liquid state.

  11. itsadeadmansparty

    Why was this video banned before?

  12. itsadeadmansparty

    What is the opening song?
    whats the song with the banjo and bass?

  13. 5942erict

    Pourquoi ce système n’est pas installé en FRANCE??? …peut-être loobing EDF???
    Plus de centrales nucléaire!! donc plus de déchets!!!
    Pensons aux prochaines générations.

  14. 911Truthseekers3

    who are the idiots that hit dont like?! However Mike could do this without solar!

  15. jakazza

    Hats off to you Michael Strizki. AND the music’s groovy

  16. GreanGrow

    Keep up the good work ! Can you do it at my house too ?

  17. jdcproducts

    @graceman25
    Its comments like “oil is safer and cleaner for our national needs” that we are in the mess were in now. I am also an engineer who see’s a way of getting off the grid entirely. This a complicated and expensive system but the technology is sound and can easily be replicated by off the shelf parts. Hydrogen by itself is a lot safer than any gas out there right now. HHO on the other hand is a different story.

  18. graceman25

    As an engineer I appluad you.
    Oil is safer and cleaner for our national needs however.
    Lead acid batteries are highly toxic. Hydrogen explosions are bad policy, we cant have every person running a system like this. most of them arent smart enough and would have an O2 exhaust fire.
    On a personal note however, fine work sir. fine fine work.

  19. brotherjupiter

    I allways thought the electrolyzer water needed an electrolite like baking powder or hydrogen peroxide added for the electrons to move efficiently.

  20. prop23FAIL

    Love IT!!! California needs to invest more in Green Tech!!! Prop 23 is down in the polls, but the Yes on 23 campaign just got a new influx of hot, anonymous cash, so we’ll need to fend them off in the home stretch to Election Day.

    Hit me back if you’d like to talk Prop 23. We’re coming out with a bunch of great No on Prop 23 videos soon!

    - prop23FAIL

  21. djdavyjay

    Kudos to Mike for his passion & work. We need to stop using dirty fossil fuels NOW. Most emerging technology starts out big & expensive but it has to start somewhere. The compressed hydrogen tanks scare me. Instead, metal hydride tanks can be used to achieve the same storage in a much smaller and safer package. Question: instead of letting O2 escape to the air would it make sense to recycle back into the system? Air only has about 21% O2. Or, bottle it and sell it.

  22. 360atGOD

    The total cost, $500,000, was paid for in part with a $250,000 grant from the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities

  23. MrNobodyNothing

    @08rhall
    I STRONGLY Disagree with you.
    You have not indicated WHAT TYPE of “research and development”, that
    you are referring to. There ARE ALREADY “free energy” generators that are
    proven OVER UNITY in design. Manufacture and marketing and distribution are needed, NOT more useless “research and developement” that spend more money paying “researchers and developers” to play around while getting paid large sums of money and producing NOTHING!
    What direction are YOU referring to???

  24. 08rhall

    @MrNobodyNothing The problem with off the shelf parts is we know they’re grossly not cost efficient. Money is better spent at this point on advancing the technology. If it was a small grant that was given to him, I would have no problem with it, it’s simply the amount of money was very large and could have been much better spent funding research and development rather than satisfying a single citizen’s dreams.

  25. MrNobodyNothing

    @08rhall
    It SOUNDS good! Now why don’t YOU make some videos showing all the good people just what you would do??? Talk IS cheap. Time is getting short and the
    need is great for alternative energy. Besides, What is wrong with off the shelf parts??? They already exist, TODAY! He is demonstrating a non oil based and non polluting technology in practice and application. Change has to start somewhere and he IS demonstrating acceptable change to the public.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>